Authors
Composition Requirements
1. Prospective authors are kindly invited to submit full papers that include the following elements:
Metadata – title, keywords, abstract, professional affiliation(s), and cited references in the bibliography must be included, and written in the English Language.
Abstract – a brief and objective summary that previews the rest of the paper it describes. It should be succinct yet provide enough information about the paper to facilitate a decision on whether the entire paper could be read with profit.
Introduction – an introductory statement of the purpose of the paper, usually describing the hypothesis that will be tested and a summary of related previous work by others.
Methods – the methods that are used to test the hypothesis should be given in sufficient detail that another researcher in the field could duplicate the testing.
Results – the hypothesis should be tested and data representing the results of the testing presented.
Conclusion – the data should be discussed and the results interpreted, and conclusions given.Requirements
2. The paper should be no less than 4 pages. The paper is limited with 6 pages, including figures, tables & references (Additional pages will be permitted at the cost of $30 per additional page)
3. The paper must print clearly and legibly, including all the figures, tables, equations in a standard way.
4. When your full paper get finished, please submit it via the paper submission system. Acceptance or rejection will be announced after the peer review process.
5. All accepted papers must designate at least one author to be present at the conference.
Submission Method
Please submit papers via Submission System.
Academic Ethics
Submissions to the conference must present original work that has not been published previously. These papers, which can be either experimental or theoretical, must not be under consideration for publication in any other venue. We hold ethical standards in the highest regard within the academic community. Consequently, any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly forbidden. Should an author be found guilty of such misconduct, their paper will be rejected or removed from the final conference publications.
Additionally, the fabrication of data is considered a significant violation of scientific principles. This includes selectively reporting data with the intention to mislead or deceive, as well as stealing data or research results from others. Such actions are grave offenses against the expected norms of scientific conduct and will be dealt with the utmost seriousness. Ethical integrity is the cornerstone of credible research, and we are committed to maintaining these standards rigorously.
Finally, articles written using artificial intelligence are also considered to be contrary to the rules of scientific ethics and will be excluded from the conference proceedings.
Reviewing process (Editorial Policy)
A preliminary review will be conducted by conference editors to make sure all papers are within the scope of this conference. If not, the submission will be rejected or suggested to other applicable conferences. The author names, emails and affiliations will be removed constantly when they are sent to conference committee members (reviewers) for peer review.
To keep scientific integrity, one of our editors will run Turnitin on each new submission to check if it has potential problem of plagiarism and AI. Papers not passing the plagiarism check will be desk rejected immediately.
Each reviewer will be asked to fill in the reviewing form and 8 criteria in total are to be scored (Y/N), including:
①Relevance: Is this article relevant to the subject coverage of the conference?
②Motivation: Does the problem considered have a sound motivation?
③Repetition: Have significant parts of the manuscript already been published?
④Content: Does the article include the following parts: Author information, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Methods and Materials, Conclusions, References
⑤Contribution: Could the research contribute to relevant fields?
⑥Reference: Is the reference adequate, necessary and well-cited?
⑦Language: Is the presentation and language accurate and concise?
⑧Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: Are they essential and clear?
An overall evaluation or detailed reviewing result (if any) will be given. At the end of the form, the final decision of Accept/Revision/Reject should be selected. When it is marked by Revision, we will have a double check of the revised paper before acceptation.
Presentation Guideline
Presentation duration
You have a 15-minute slot allocated in which to present, but your presentation itself should be no longer than 13 minutes. We would suggest aiming for around 12–13 minutes. This will allow ample time for directly engaging with the audience through discussion and questions.
Number of Slides
There is no perfect number of slides for a PowerPoint presentation, but the concept "less is more" applies here. We suggest approximately 10–15 slides for a 15-minute presentation.
Practice Makes Perfect
Long before the conference, make sure you spend ample time distilling and crafting your ideas into a well-thought-out presentation. Do NOT just read out your paper – a well-written paper does not equal an interesting and effective presentation.
Practice delivery, timing and use of visuals a long while ahead of the event with your colleagues and friends. Invite feedback and incorporate their criticisms as you polish your presentation, which should be interesting and informative, well paced and lively. Show your passion for your subject: enthusiasm is infectious!
Dress code
There is no official dress code, but delegates generally wear business casual. However, professional attire is appreciated by fellow professionals, so we suggest erring on the smart side – although a tie is not necessary!
Timing
Aim to arrive the conference room at least a fifteen minutes in advance before the session starts. Time is of vital importance in making a presentation, so please be aware of the overall length of your presentation, as well as how the time is divided within your presentation, to ensure that you leave the appropriate amount of time for each point.
Publication
Submitted papers will go through a rigorous full peer review process. Submitted papers will go through a rigorous full peer review process. Accepted papers will be published in the SHS Web of Conferences proceedings, indexed by Scopus, CNKI, CPCI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ProQuest, etc.
eISSN: 2267-1242
EDP Sciences
Visa Application
Conference participants who bear a foreign passport may need to apply for a Uzbekistan visa to visit Uzbekistan. Participants can apply for a visa at the Uzbekistan embassy or consulate in the region where they live. To avoid any uncertainty, participants are advised to apply for the visa as early as possible. For more information, please contact the local Uzbekistan Embassy in your country.
Invitation Letters
1. The invitation letter will be issued by the Committee Board after the successful registration is finished.
2. Your name provided must be exactly the same as it appears on your passport. Any discrepancy between your name on your passport and on your invitation letter or other documentations could lead to a delay and/or denial of your visa application.
3. Please note that the Conference and its organizing committees are not authorized to assist with your VISA application process beyond providing the Notification of Invitation Letter issued by the Conference and conference Committee Board. Should your application be denied, Conference and its organizing committee cannot change the decision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, nor will the Conference and its organizing committee engage in any discussion or correspondence with the Embassy on behalf of the applicant. The registration fee cannot be refunded when the VISA application of individual is denied.